|
The expression
"In those days..." is a typical Hebraism that draws
attention to a period of time of significant interest.
John the Baptist began preaching in the wilderness.
Matthew spends no time telling us who John the Baptist
was. He felt no need to! Every Jew would have known
who John the Baptist was! And Matthew was writing for a
Jewish audience. Luke, writing for a Gentile Greek
audience spends considerable time on John's birth (Lk 15-24,
39-80). For Matthew no introduction of John was
necessary. However, John's ministry and introduction of
Jesus was important to Matthew's message about Jesus.
In keeping with his policy,
Matthew introduces John with a fulfillment passage, but this one
is not one of the formulaic passage. In this case, Matthew
(as does Mark and Luke when they cite the Old Testament) quotes
from the Septuagint. Notice the slight difference in
punctuation between the translation form the Hebrew which one
encounters in Isa 40:3, and the translation from the Septuagint.
|
RSV Old
Testament
Hebrew Based Translation |
RSV New
Testament
Septuagint Based Translation |
A
voice cries:
"In the wilderness prepare the way of the Lord,
make straight in the desert a highway for our God |
|
|
"The
voice of one crying in the wilderness:
Prepare the way of the Lord, make his paths
straight." |
It is interesting that the Qumran
Community when using this passage in regard to their ministry
adopted the Hebrew punctuation, "The voice of one
crying: In the wilderness..." Matthew wishing
to stress that John's ministry took place in the wilderness, not
in Jerusalem, was comfortable with the Septuagint, which suited
his purpose. It was in the wilderness that John was preparing
for the ministry of the Messiah, for the Messiah's ministry
would begin not in Jerusalem, but outside of that
influence. In fact, in Mat 23,24 Matthew will stress that
Messianic ministry and expectation was not attached to Jerusalem
and the Temple, for the temple was to be destroyed. At
both the beginning of his Gospel and at the end, Matthew distances
the Messianic ministry from Jerusalem and the temple.
We will return to the opening
words of John's preaching shortly, but first we should notice
that when the Pharisees and Sadducees come put for baptism, John
severely warns them to repent for judgment (an axe) is ready to
take place over them. Again, Matthew is distancing Jesus
and his ministry from Jerusalem, the Temple, and the Jewish
powers. They are to be judged by God for their rejection
of the Messiah.
John likewise distances himself
and his ministry from that of the Messiah. He baptizes in
(or with) water based on repentance, but Jesus' ministry and
baptism will come in the fullness and power of the Holy
Spirit.
In Mat 3:6 John preaches a
baptism related to the confession of sins. In 3:8 and 3:11
we notice that repentance is associated with John's
baptism. In 3:1 he began his preaching with
"Repent...". Mark puts it simply, "John the
baptizer appeared in the wilderness, preaching a baptism of
repentance for the forgiveness of sins." (Mk 1:4).
From this we learn that John's baptism was based on repentance
and was associated with the forgiveness of sins.
But what is the difference
between this baptism of John and the Christian baptism shortly
to be proclaimed by Jesus? Both John's and Christian
baptism are based on repentance and are for the forgiveness of
sins. Some having been baptized by John's baptism needed
to be re-baptized (Acts 19:1-5). It is obvious that
although John's baptism was for the forgiveness of sins, it was
a transitory baptism, shortly to be replaced by a baptism that
Jesus commanded Matt 28:19, 20, Mk 15:16). Both John's and
Christian baptism were based on faith in God and repentance of
sins, and were for the forgiveness of sins.
The difference was the sacrificial
system upon which they built. John's was under the yearly sacrificial
system of animal sacrifices, Christian baptism was and is under
the permanent, once for all time, sacrifice of Jesus. John's
baptism was temporary under a temporary sacrificial system to
last only until the permanent sacrifice of Jesus.
Jesus commanded his disciples
(apostles) to go and make disciples of all nations (Mat 28:19,
20, Mk 16:15,16). John's baptism was only for the Jews.
|
EXCURSUS
ON CHRISTIAN BAPTISM |
Notice for a
moment the nature and purpose of Christian baptism:
| Mk
16:15, 16 |
It is
based on faith in Jesus (and is therefore, for
those who can believe) |
| Acts
2:38 |
It is
based on repentance |
| Acts
2:38 |
It is
for remission (forgiveness) of sins |
| Acts
8:37 |
It is
in water |
| Acts
8:37-39 |
It is
by immersion |
| 1 Pet
3:21 |
It
saves (because it is based on faith in Jesus and
obedience to God) |
| Rom
6:3-8; Col 2:12 |
It
unites one with Christ, his death, burial and
resurrection |
| Acts
2:38 |
It is
not a work we do (be baptized is in the passive
voice, it is something that is done to us) |
| Col
2:12 |
It is
trusting (faith) in the work that God is doing |
| Gal
3:26, 27 |
It
places on in Christ |
| Acts
22:16 |
It
washes away sins (by association with the death
of Jesus and his shed blood) |
Christian baptism is not
a work the candidate does to earn salvation.
Baptism is the candidates response out of faith in the
working and grace of God.
Baptism is a response to (an act of) faith in the grace
of God.
The Christian is not saved by his own obedience and
work, but by faith in the grace of God, who saves
through Jesus' death. |
We return now to John the
Baptist's preaching (Mat 3:2).
"Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand"
This short statement is loaded with significant theological
concepts!
Each word carries with it loaded meanings!
Note that it is exactly the same message Jesus came preaching
(Mat 4:17), "Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at
hand."
Each of these terms has significant eschatological
implications. (click on eschatology
and eschatological
language).
By this we mean that they have final, end
of the world implications!
The Christian (and NT) world view is that
Jesus initiated the "last days", and that we now live
in these last days. These are the days
for salvation.
The next "days" or "age" is eternity.
These are the days in which we must be saved.
Notice these scriptures:
| Acts
2:17 |
"And in
the last days it shall be, God declares, that I will
pour out my Spirit upon all flesh..." |
| Heb
1:1,2 |
"but in
these last days he has spoken to us by a
Son..." |
| 1
Pet 1:20 |
"He was
destined before the foundation of the world but was made
manifest at the end of the times for your
sake." |
| 1
John 2:18 |
"Children,
it is the last hour; and as you have heard that
antichrist is coming, so now many antichrists have come;
therefore we know that it is the last hour" |
From the New Testament perspective, we
are living in the last days. This brings a sense of
urgency to what we do and how we live. In the early years
of the 20th century, several German theologians suggested that
eschatology should be removed from time ( a timeless
eschatology) and interpreted simply as those matters that
carried with them a sense of urgency and significance.
They were wrong in removing eschatology from time or history,
but correct in identifying eschatological matters with a sense
of urgency.
If Jesus was
ushering in the last days, if the Christian age is the last days
(both of which we endorse) then there is a sense of urgency in
John's and Jesus' preaching. What they preached had end
time significance!
Mark 1:15 records
Jesus' preaching "The time is fulfilled, and the
kingdom of heaven is at hand; repent and believe the
gospel."
Recognizing that
the time was fulfilled and that Jesus was about to usher in the
last days, John seized the sense of urgency and preached
"Repent..." The time for delay was past.
The time for repentance was here! God was about to restore
his kingdom through his Messiah, Jesus. There was sense of
urgency in the air. When the Pharisees and Sadducees came
out for baptism not manifesting repentance, John got all over
them, calling them a "brood of vipers"!
Repentance,
therefore, is an eschatological term of significance and
urgency. The time of the last days was at hand.
The reason for
repentance was that the kingdom of heaven was at
hand! This is a Matthean term. In the similar
passages in Mark and Luke they refer to this as the kingdom
of God. Two matters of interest are presented here, 1)
the term kingdom, 2) the term heaven.
1) The word
kingdom in Greek is basileia (basileia).
The root meaning of basileia is to reign.
When the Bible speaks of the kingdom of God it has
reference to the reign of God. Kingdom
speaks of what God is doing. the reign from heaven,
the reign of God, to take place through his Messianic king, was
about to break into human experience in a unique and powerful
manner. Without question, repentance was necessary before
God through Jesus could reign in people's hearts and
lives.
Kingdom of
heaven: Matthew does not normally use the expression kingdom of
God (except in 4 instances in Mat 12:28; 19:24; 21:41; 43) for
it would be inappropriate for a Jew to speak or write God's
name. Under normal circumstances the Jew would substitute
something similar in the place of the word God, hence
Matthew uses the expression kingdom of heaven rather than
kingdom of God. (Matthew uses kingdom of heaven 32
times in 31 verses, kingdom of God 4 times in 4
verses. Kingdom of God is found 52 times in the
Gospels, but only 4 times in Matthew. Kingdom of heaven
is not found at all in the remaining Gospels, including
John. [These are RSV translation counts]).
Because the
kingdom of God is at
hand
(Mark 1:14 "The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God
is at hand; repent, and believe in the gospel.") John
preaches that the Jews should repent. the urgency for the
need to repent is that God's reign is about to break in on them
in the person of Jesus, the Messiah. But what exactly does
"at
hand"
mean?
| PAY
CAREFUL ATTENTION |
Here
in this expression we are introduced to a fascinating
Jewish idiom. Literally the term can mean
"close" or "near", but we
learn that in certain contexts terms take on
heightened importance and meanings.
In eschatological contexts words often take on
special significance and are enhanced by the
context. In this case, since eschatology
often signifies significant time, "at
hand" means more than simply
"close" or "near". It
takes on the sense of "already
here" or "so certain that it
can be spoken of as here". In
eschatological discussions we speak of Inaugurated
Eschatology in the sense that the end has
already begun, or is already breaking in.
We have already noted that Heb 1:2 and Luke in
Act 2:17 speak of the last days as
having already arrived. With the
coming of Jesus, the Messiah, the messianic
kingdom of God could be spoken of as breaking
into human experience. This is what
John means when he proclaims that the kingdom
of heaven is at hand. He means that
the kingdom of heaven/God is so certain that
since Jesus is now here, it (the kingdom) is
already breaking in. There is a sense of
urgency here. God's reign is so certain,
and in the person of Jesus is already breaking
in, that the Jews needed to repent
immediately. Jesus
will say in Mat 12:28 "... if it is
by the Spirit of God that I cast out demons,
then the kingdom of God has come upon
you...," indicating that the kingdom in his
person was already here! |
|
 |
We can understand
the urgency of John's preaching in that he recognized, as did
Jesus, that the time for the kingdom was fulfilled (Mk 1:14),
that the king was drawing near, and that the kingdom was so
certain that the Jews needed to repent and get their lives
sorted out in order to be ready for the king and the kingdom.
The idiomatic
expression "the axe is laid to the root" was a
Hebraism (Hebrew idiom) for judgment. Judgment was already
beginning and breaking in on Israel and the world in the coming
of the Messiah, who we read in Acts 17:30, 31 will judge the
whole world in righteousness. Notice in Acts 17:30,31, the
call to repentance.
John's and Jesus' baptism:
John baptizes with water (can be translated "in
water" or "with water") for repentance, that is
to demonstrate repentance.
Jesus was to baptize them " with the Holy
Spirit" (can be translated "in the Holy Spirit")
and fire.
But Jesus baptism was to be "with the Holy Spirit and
fire."
Some have suggested that the Holy Spirit aspect of Jesus'
baptism was the life giving power of salvation and the fire
would refer to the judgment Jesus would also bring. This
is possible since fire is associated with judgment, and the next
sentence introduces fire and judgment.
However, fire is also associated in the Jewish tradition
with the cleansing or purifying power of God. So in
this case, seeing that Holy Spirit and fire are joined by the
coordinating conjunction kai
(kai - and, indeed, also) we possibly should understand this fire
as the purifying work of God through Jesus in salvation.
There is no question that in the next verse the unquenchable
fire is a reference to the final judgment (Isa 34:8-10,
66:24; Jer 7:20; 2 Pet 3:10-12).
|